Can things get worse for real estate values in the Tracy/Central Valley Area of California?
Saturday, October 23, 2010
One would think that things couldn’t get any tougher for real estate brokers in the Central Valley of California with the housing market slumping badly after the first-time homebuyer tax credit disappeared; but wait, there’s more. Central Valley buyers and sellers are closely eying the changes from the Federal Housing Administration to gauge possible impacts.
Why should brokers worry about the FHA? The obvious answer is; the FHA insures about 30 percent of all home loans in the United States and and that means a lot to the folks in and around the Central Valley. New FHA borrowers are required (as of Oct. 4, 2010) to have a minimum FICO score of 580 to qualify for the minimum 3.5 percent down payment. New borrowers with a FICO score in the range of 500-579 must now put down at least a 10 percent down payment, and those with FICO scores below 500 cannot qualify.
“Based on HUD statistics, less than 2 percent of all borrowers who use the FHA loans have credit scores of less than 580, and this slice of borrowers are the most likely to get into trouble with a 27% default rate. Also, consider the reduction in upfront premiums for FHA mortgage insurance moving from 2.25 percent to 1 percent in the recent changes, while the statutory limit on annual premiums rose from 0.55 percent to 1.55 percent.
Those FHA borrowers with loan-to-value ratios of up to 95 percent will see an increase in annual premiums to 0.85 percent, and those with higher LTVs will see annual premiums rise to 0.9 percent. Perhaps they should look at the high debt rations of these borrowers to determine whether they will be able to handle the additional debt.
A borrower can still get a mortgage loan with a debt ratio as high as 55 percent of gross monthly income. A family can be approved for a mortgage with a combined debt load of $2,750 per month with a net income of about $3,500, which leaves them $750 a month to live on, including groceries, electrical bills, other utilities, kids’ stuff, etc. That is not a whole lot of money to live on for a family of four.
In the early 1990s, before the advent of automated underwriting, the maximum debt ratio was 41 percent on an FHA loan, which may have already been a stretch for many home owning families. Back then the FHA was stricter — if you had even a 44 percent debt ratio, you were not going to get a loan. While it’s true some homeowners can handle the higher debt load, the statistics don’t lie. In most cases, an individual who has a 620 credit score perhaps should not be allowed a 50 percent debt ratio. Yet, by FHA standards, that is allowable.
The FHA fund has fallen so low that the government entity is running through a number of alternative plans to increase credit quality, reduce default rates and not to have to go begging to Congress for money – maybe, the FHA just needs to run smarter. With the housing market in the Central Valley of California, like most of the rest of the country, is hanging on every change in the lending industry, it will be interesting to see what changes, if any these new policies of the FHA will have on the market.




');![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=0c08b299-e354-4d5f-a179-3f4b6d1a3a43)